Minimum definition of Incremental Reading - Revision history

Guillem at 18:52, 9 July 2023

2023-07-09T18:52:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 9 July 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:

	{{Wozquote\|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below:		{{Wozquote\|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below:


	First Steps options		First Steps options

Guillem at 18:52, 9 July 2023

2023-07-09T18:52:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 9 July 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:
	[[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.		[[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.

	{{Wozquote\|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below}}:		{{Wozquote\|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below:

	First Steps options		First Steps options
Line 43:		Line 43:
	* popular site filters (Wikipedia, YouTube, etc.)		* popular site filters (Wikipedia, YouTube, etc.)
	* tools for automatic decomposition of data (e.g. article splitting, dismember, decompose, etc.)		* tools for automatic decomposition of data (e.g. article splitting, dismember, decompose, etc.)
	* more formats for incremental learning: video, audio, mail, etc. Also: PDF, PowerPoint, and OneNote, although it is hard to demand this as part of the definition, esp. that SuperMemo fails to support these progress statistics		* more formats for incremental learning: video, audio, mail, etc. Also: PDF, PowerPoint, and OneNote, although it is hard to demand this as part of the definition, esp. that SuperMemo fails to support these progress statistics}}

Guillem at 18:51, 9 July 2023

2023-07-09T18:51:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 9 July 2023
Line 12:		Line 12:

	First Steps options		First Steps options
	spaced repetition
	extracts		* spaced repetition
	cloze deletions		* extracts
	read points (bookmarks)		* cloze deletions
	priority queue		* read points (bookmarks)
	repetition auto-sort and auto-postpone		* priority queue
	extract and cloze hierarchy in the knowledge tree (necessary for semantic review)		* repetition auto-sort and auto-postpone
	easy imports from the web (at least HTML and images)		* extract and cloze hierarchy in the knowledge tree (necessary for semantic review)
	HTML rendition (WYSIWYG)		* easy imports from the web (at least HTML and images)
	propagating images		* HTML rendition (WYSIWYG)
			* propagating images

	Vital Options		Vital Options
	mid-interval review with a correction for spacing effect ~~(see: Algorithm SM-17)~~
	early review tools (e.g. Advance, Add to Outstanding, etc.)		* mid-interval review with a correction for spacing effect
	semantic review tools (esp. search&review, branch review, subset, etc.)		* early review tools (e.g. Advance, Add to Outstanding, etc.)
	overload tools (e.g. Mercy, Postpone, or similar)		* semantic review tools (esp. search&review, branch review, subset, etc.)
	propagating references		* overload tools (e.g. Mercy, Postpone, or similar)
	image download/localization		* propagating references
			* image download/localization

	Other options available in SuperMemo		Other options available in SuperMemo
	A-Factor-based article review algorithm (or similar)
	processing attributes and formatting (e.g. extracts, cloze keywords, highlights, ignored texts, etc.)		* A-Factor-based article review algorithm (or similar)
	source-linking and hierarchy		* processing attributes and formatting (e.g. extracts, cloze keywords, highlights, ignored texts, etc.)
	visual learning (image zooming, cropping, compressing)		* source-linking and hierarchy
	wholesale file&folder imports (with folder hierarchies)		* visual learning (image zooming, cropping, compressing)
	web search tools (e.g. for easy imports from dictionaries and favorite data sites)		* wholesale file&folder imports (with folder hierarchies)
	popular site filters (Wikipedia, YouTube, etc.)		* web search tools (e.g. for easy imports from dictionaries and favorite data sites)
	tools for automatic decomposition of data (e.g. article splitting, dismember, decompose, etc.)		* popular site filters (Wikipedia, YouTube, etc.)
	more formats for incremental learning: video, audio, mail, etc. Also: PDF, PowerPoint, and OneNote, although it is hard to demand this as part of the definition, esp. that SuperMemo fails to support these		* tools for automatic decomposition of data (e.g. article splitting, dismember, decompose, etc.)
	progress statistics		* more formats for incremental learning: video, audio, mail, etc. Also: PDF, PowerPoint, and OneNote, although it is hard to demand this as part of the definition, esp. that SuperMemo fails to support these progress statistics

Guillem at 18:49, 9 July 2023

2023-07-09T18:49:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 9 July 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:
	[[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.		[[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.

	{{Wozquote\|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below:		{{Wozquote\|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below}}:

	First Steps options		First Steps options
Line 44:		Line 44:


	}}


	==='''User experience is vital'''===		==='''User experience is vital'''===
	<blockquote>mj wrote: Incremental reading was born in SuperMemo. I believe that nobody should claim to have implemented incremental reading without using it first in SuperMemo himself. The theoretical description is very different from practical applications. I believe that the text about incremental reading is very short, tools used in incremental reading are much larger, and the practical training for doing it well is even larger. This means that incremental reading is two orders of magnitude bigger than that was is written about it at SuperMemo website. '''I cannot imagine implementing incremental reading without using it for 2-3 years first!!! It is like designing a new sports car without ever sitting behind the wheel of any car!'''</blockquote>		<blockquote>mj wrote: Incremental reading was born in SuperMemo. I believe that nobody should claim to have implemented incremental reading without using it first in SuperMemo himself. The theoretical description is very different from practical applications. I believe that the text about incremental reading is very short, tools used in incremental reading are much larger, and the practical training for doing it well is even larger. This means that incremental reading is two orders of magnitude bigger than that was is written about it at SuperMemo website. '''I cannot imagine implementing incremental reading without using it for 2-3 years first!!! It is like designing a new sports car without ever sitting behind the wheel of any car!'''</blockquote>

Guillem at 18:49, 9 July 2023

2023-07-09T18:49:01Z

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 [[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.
-{{Wozquote|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below}}
+{{Wozquote|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below:
 ==='''User experience is vital'''===
 <blockquote>mj wrote: Incremental reading was born in SuperMemo. I believe that nobody should claim to have implemented incremental reading without using it first in SuperMemo himself. The theoretical description is very different from practical applications. I believe that the text about incremental reading is very short, tools used in incremental reading are much larger, and the practical training for doing it well is even larger. This means that incremental reading is two orders of magnitude bigger than that was is written about it at SuperMemo website. '''I cannot imagine implementing incremental reading without using it for 2-3 years first!!! It is like designing a new sports car without ever sitting behind the wheel of any car!'''</blockquote>

Guillem at 18:48, 9 July 2023

2023-07-09T18:48:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 9 July 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:
	[[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.		[[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.

	{{Wozquote}}		{{Wozquote\|The term "incremental reading" is nearly two decades old, and it slowly percolates into the awareness of users of spaced repetition. To ensure that no half-baked product can claim the title, please demand that the authors of software that claims to "implement incremental reading" comply with the "minimum definition" outline below}}


	==='''User experience is vital'''===		==='''User experience is vital'''===
	<blockquote>mj wrote: Incremental reading was born in SuperMemo. I believe that nobody should claim to have implemented incremental reading without using it first in SuperMemo himself. The theoretical description is very different from practical applications. I believe that the text about incremental reading is very short, tools used in incremental reading are much larger, and the practical training for doing it well is even larger. This means that incremental reading is two orders of magnitude bigger than that was is written about it at SuperMemo website. '''I cannot imagine implementing incremental reading without using it for 2-3 years first!!! It is like designing a new sports car without ever sitting behind the wheel of any car!'''</blockquote>		<blockquote>mj wrote: Incremental reading was born in SuperMemo. I believe that nobody should claim to have implemented incremental reading without using it first in SuperMemo himself. The theoretical description is very different from practical applications. I believe that the text about incremental reading is very short, tools used in incremental reading are much larger, and the practical training for doing it well is even larger. This means that incremental reading is two orders of magnitude bigger than that was is written about it at SuperMemo website. '''I cannot imagine implementing incremental reading without using it for 2-3 years first!!! It is like designing a new sports car without ever sitting behind the wheel of any car!'''</blockquote>

Guillem: Created page with " Piotr Wozniak has defined Incremental Reading https://supermemo.guru/wiki/Minimum_definition_of_incremental_reading Incremental Reading is a proper noun. It happens to be two common words used together. "Incremental" stands for the main aspect of Incremental Reading which is incrementalism, but that is just one of the aspects of the method; there is more. That is, a methof of reading that is incremental doesn't make it Incremental Reading. Piot..."

2023-07-09T18:47:16Z

Created page with " Piotr Wozniak has defined Incremental Reading https://supermemo.guru/wiki/Minimum_definition_of_incremental_reading Incremental Reading is a proper noun. It happens to be two common words used together. "Incremental" stands for the main aspect of Incremental Reading which is incrementalism, but that is just one of the aspects of the method; there is more. That is, a methof of reading that is incremental doesn't make it Incremental Reading. Piot..."

New page

[[Piotr Wozniak]] has defined [[Incremental Reading]]

https://supermemo.guru/wiki/Minimum_definition_of_incremental_reading

[[Incremental Reading]] is a proper noun. It happens to be two common words used together. "Incremental" stands for the main aspect of [[Incremental Reading]] which is incrementalism, but that is just one of the aspects of the method; there is more. That is, a methof of reading that is incremental doesn't make it [[Incremental Reading]].

[[Piotr Wozniak]] could have coined a new word for the method so no disembiguity would be necessary.

{{Wozquote}}

==='''User experience is vital'''===
<blockquote>mj wrote: Incremental reading was born in SuperMemo. I believe that nobody should claim to have implemented incremental reading without using it first in SuperMemo himself. The theoretical description is very different from practical applications. I believe that the text about incremental reading is very short, tools used in incremental reading are much larger, and the practical training for doing it well is even larger. This means that incremental reading is two orders of magnitude bigger than that was is written about it at SuperMemo website. '''I cannot imagine implementing incremental reading without using it for 2-3 years first!!! It is like designing a new sports car without ever sitting behind the wheel of any car!'''</blockquote>